You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
|
Author, year
|
Study design
|
Enrolled sample number (G1/G2)
|
Age (G1/G2)
|
Female sex (G1/G2)
|
Comparing
|
Mean follow-up
|
Surgical approach
|
Single or multi-surgeon
|
Outcome measurement
|
|---|
| | |
a
|
b
|
c
|
d
|
e
|
f
|
g
|
|---|
|
Nonne, 2019 [9]
|
Retrospective comparative study
|
88/60
|
86.1/87.6
|
66(75%)/45(75%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
28.3 months
|
PL
|
Not mentioned
|
V
|
V
| | |
V
| | |
|
Ukaj, 2019 [10]
|
Randomized controlled trial
|
32/34
|
77.6/78.1
|
15(32%)/24(51%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
36 months
|
PL
|
Single surgeon
|
V
|
V
| |
V
|
V
|
V
|
V
|
|
Iorio, 2019 [11]
|
Randomized controlled trial
|
30/30
|
83/82
|
17(57%)/18(60%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
12 months
|
DL
|
Not mentioned
|
V
|
V
|
V
|
V
| |
V
| |
|
Fahad, 2019 [12]
|
Retrospective comparative study
|
77/27
|
71.1/69.3
|
46(60%)/14(52%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
12 months
|
DL or PL
|
Multi-surgeon
| |
V
| |
V
|
V
| | |
|
Kim, 2018 [13]
|
Retrospective comparative study
|
84/84
|
72.9/73.1
|
57(68%)/58(69%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
21.9 months
|
PL
|
Single surgeon
|
V
| | |
V
|
V
|
V
|
V
|
|
Boukebous, 2018 [14]
|
Retrospective comparative study
|
101/98
|
83.3/77.8
|
73(73%)/70(71%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
24.6 months
|
PL
|
Multi-surgeon
|
V
| |
V
| | |
V
| |
|
Ochi, 2017 [16]
|
Retrospective comparative study
|
20/33
|
75.4/80.0
|
16(75%)/26(78%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
20.5 months
|
DAA
|
Multi-surgeon
|
V
|
V
|
V
|
V
| |
V
|
V
|
|
Bensen, 2014 [15]
|
Retrospective comparative study
|
171/175
|
84.1/75.2
|
131(77%)/123(70%)
|
HA vs. DM
|
23.5 months
|
PL
|
Multi-surgeon
|
V
|
V
|
V
|
V
| |
V
|
V
|
- G1: HA hemiarthroplasty; G2: DM dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty; DAA direct anterior approach; DL direct lateral approach; PL posterolateral approach; a dislocation; b Implant failure; c reoperation; d 1-year mortality; e Harris hip score; f operation time; g intraoperative blood loss
